<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog by Surreal Road &#187; Tips &amp; Tricks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/category/tips-tricks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Save stills from Final Cut Pro</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2010/save-stills-from-final-cut-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2010/save-stills-from-final-cut-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final cut pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickTime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.surrealroad.com/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a quick way for anyone looking to save a number of stills from a Final Cut Pro project: Create a new sequence at the desired resolution and open it in the timeline For each still you want to output: Open the clip or sequence in the viewer Cue to the frame to export Mark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quick way for anyone looking to save a number of stills from a Final Cut Pro project:</p>
<ol>
<li>Create a new sequence at the desired resolution and open it in the timeline</li>
<li>For each still you want to output:
<ol>
<li>Open the clip or sequence in the viewer</li>
<li>Cue to the frame to export</li>
<li>Mark in/out (type &#8220;IO&#8221;) on the frame</li>
<li>Cut it into the timeline (press F9)</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Select all the clips in the timeline</li>
<li>Add a &#8220;de-interlace&#8221; filter to them</li>
<li>From the File menu, choose &#8220;Export &gt; Using QuickTime Conversion&#8221;</li>
<li>Change the format to &#8220;Image sequence&#8221;</li>
<li>Click options</li>
<li>Choose the desired file format</li>
<li>Make sure the frame rate matches the frame rate of the sequence</li>
<li>Click ok</li>
</ol>
<p>Strange that there isn&#8217;t really a more convenient way, but there you go.</p>
<p>(For more tips and tricks, see my book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0240811240?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=surrealroad0a-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0240811240">Fix It In Post</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2010/save-stills-from-final-cut-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get started with RAID</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/get-started-with-raid/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/get-started-with-raid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/get-started-with-raid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lifehacker is running a nice article for beginners on how to set up your own RAID system&#8230; Hard drives fail, and they do it much more often than we&#8217;d like to think. Even if you&#8217;ve set up automated hard drive backups, you&#8217;re not necessarily getting the best backup bang for your buck—especially if your operating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lifehacker is running a nice article for beginners on <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/229779112/set-up-real+time-bulletproof-backup-drive-redundancy-with-raid">how to set up your own RAID system&#8230;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hard drives fail, and they do it much more often than we&#8217;d like to think. Even if you&#8217;ve set up automated hard drive backups, you&#8217;re not necessarily getting the best backup bang for your buck—especially if your operating system&#8217;s main hard drive fails. Even if you&#8217;ve been backing up your important files, you&#8217;ll still need to reinstall your OS and go through the pain of copying your files back to your new hard drive, installing new applications, and setting up your system to how you had it. There&#8217;s a better way, my friends. With a RAID 1 array, you&#8217;ll always have a perfect backup of your hard drive so that—in the event that one drive fails—the other will seamlessly pick up where it left off. That means no reinstalling your operating system, no reinstalling applications, and no time lost in the event of a hard drive failure.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, don&#8217;t think of it as completely bulletproof as they suggest: the basic idea of RAID assumes that only one disk will fail at a time. In theory this is great, but in practice I&#8217;ve had 3 disks in a RAID set fail simultaneously, rendering the system useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/get-started-with-raid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resizing Shots in Final Cut Studio: The Letterbox</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-the-letterbox/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-the-letterbox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final cut studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letterbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scaling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-the-letterbox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crops&#8230; are all well and good, but sometimes you’d rather retain the complete, original image. For example, if you need to make a 4:3 dailies tape which contains 16:9 elements, you’d better be sure the whole image is there in case anything important is happening at the edges. In this case, what you need is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/cropping-in-final-cut-studio/">Crops&#8230;</a> are all well and good, but sometimes you’d rather retain the complete, original image. For example, if you need to make a 4:3 dailies tape which contains 16:9 elements, you’d better be sure the whole image is there in case anything important is happening at the edges. In this case, what you need is a letterbox, rather than a crop.</p>
<p>A letterbox retains the original shape of the footage, typically filling the rest of the frame with black (in the case of Final Cut Pro and Motion, the underlying layers provide the rest of the frame, or if there are no underlying layers, the background colour is used). By default FCP will letterbox any footage that doesn’t fit the timeline completely, automatically scaling it so that either the top and bottom or the left and right edges fit completely within the frame. This means that ordinarily you don’t need to do anything to letterbox footage. If for some reason you do (and are happy to use FCP’s scaling process to do it), the easiest way is to adjust the scaling parameter until it looks right. If you need it pixel-accurate, you’ll have to get your calculator out and plug in some numbers to get the exact percentage:</p>
<blockquote><p>( width of timeline output / width of footage ) x 100</p></blockquote>
<p>Repeat this for the timeline output and footage heights and compare the two results. For a perfect letterbox, use the lower percentage. Conversely, for a perfect crop, use the larger percentage.</p>
<p><img border="0" width="255" src="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/crop-original.jpg" alt="crop-original" height="146" /><br />
Starting with your original image&#8211;</p>
<p> <img border="0" width="169" src="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/crop-cropped.jpg" alt="crop-cropped" height="146" /><br />
&#8211;crop to fill the frame&#8211;</p>
<p><img border="0" width="146" src="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/crop-letterbox.jpg" alt="crop-letterbox" height="146" /><br />
&#8211;or letterbox to keep the whole image.</p>
<blockquote><p>Tip: To have FCP letterbox everything in a sequence use: Modify / Scale To Sequence</p></blockquote>
<p>The only sure-fire way to check which shots Final Cut Pro has seen fit to resize automatically is to look at the motion tab for each shot. Make this easier for yourself by setting the canvas sync to Open, then quickly spool through the timeline with the Motion tab open.</p>
<p>The next part of this series will look at aspect ratios.</p>
<p>(Images featured in this article are Copyright 2007 BBC Worldwide Inc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-the-letterbox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resizing Shots in Final Cut Studio: The Crop</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/cropping-in-final-cut-studio/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/cropping-in-final-cut-studio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final cut studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scaling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/cropping-in-final-cut-studio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this part of the &#8220;Resizing Shots in Final Cut Studio series, we&#8217;ll look at different methods for cropping a shot. Sometimes you need to adjust footage to fit into a different size frame. For instance, you may need to add high definition material to a standard definition timeline. In these situations Final Cut Pro [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this part of the &#8220;Resizing Shots in Final Cut Studio series, we&#8217;ll look at different methods for cropping a shot.</p>
<p>Sometimes you need to adjust footage to fit into a different size frame. For instance, you may need to add high definition material to a standard definition timeline. In these situations Final Cut Pro will automatically scale the footage up or down to fit the timeline. However, any form of scaling (and particularly FCP’s default scaling) will reduce image quality. If you find yourself in this situation, calmly open the motion tab for the shot and set the scaling back to 100%. This will ensure you get a pixel-perfect rendition of the original shot, and FCP will instead crop the footage to fit, instead of scaling it.</p>
<p>What this means is that all the pixels that don’t fit within the frame are discarded, in the same way you use the crop tool on an image in iPhoto, or a pair of scissors on a disappointing article based around Final Cut Studio.</p>
<p>What becomes important at this point is the region of interest, that is, the part of the image you want to keep. Final Cut Pro will keep the image centred by default (performing what’s known in the trade as a centre cut-out), but that doesn’t mean you have to keep it this way. Instead you can use the Center control to reposition the image (we&#8217;ll be covering the &#8220;Pan &amp; Scan&#8221; technique that dynamically repositions a shot over time in a future article).</p>
<p>There is another situation which may require the use of a crop, which is when you mix footage which is a different shape. The most common example of this is adding widescreen-formatted (16:9) material to a fullscreen (4:3) sequence (or vice versa). In this case, the procedure is exactly the same, except that you may only need to crop the top and bottom of the image (or left and right sides), keeping the rest.</p>
<p>The option to crop crops up quite a lot within Final Cut Studio*. You’ll see check-boxes and dialogue boxes with crop options all over the place throughout Final Cut Pro, Motion and Compressor, particularly when working with different kinds of media. Just be aware that in general, cropping will discard the edges of an image in favour of filling the frame.<br />
<em>*Sorry, I couldn’t resist that.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Tip: To crop unwanted parts of a frame, use the Crop parameters in the Motion tab. You can also feather this effect to soften it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/cropping-in-final-cut-studio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run 3DS MAX 2008 on a Mac</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/run-3ds-max-2008-on-a-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/run-3ds-max-2008-on-a-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/run-3ds-max-2008-on-a-mac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest version of Parallels Desktop for Mac runs 3D Studio Max 2008 in OS X.5 (Leopard), seemingly without any problems (well no additional problems that the two products don&#8217;t have independently). It also works in Parallels &#8220;Coherence&#8221; mode, so you get a seamless experience, for example dragging and dropping files from the Finder into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest version of <a href="http://www.parallels.com">Parallels Desktop</a> for Mac runs 3D Studio Max 2008 in OS X.5 (Leopard), seemingly without any problems (well no additional problems that the two products don&#8217;t have independently). It also works in Parallels &#8220;Coherence&#8221; mode, so you get a seamless experience, for example dragging and dropping files from the Finder into the 3DS Max interface.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/max-parallels.jpg"><img border="0" width="450" src="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/max-parallels-thumb.jpg" alt="max-parallels" height="270" /></a></p>
<p>The catch? DirectX rendering doesn&#8217;t seem to work, so you&#8217;ll have to use software rendering for the viewports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/run-3ds-max-2008-on-a-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resizing Shots in Final Cut Studio: Basic Scaling with QuickTime Pro</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-quicktime-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-quicktime-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final cut studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickTime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scaling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-quicktime-pro/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if you’re not concerned about quality, and don’t have access to your Final Cut Pro system? Then turn to QuickTime Pro. Anything you can view in QuickTime can be scaled to a different size. Unfortunately this method uses basic interpolation at best, and so the results will almost certainly be lacklustre. However, this can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you’re not concerned about quality, and don’t have access to your Final Cut Pro system? Then turn to QuickTime Pro.</p>
<p>Anything you can view in QuickTime can be scaled to a different size. Unfortunately this method uses basic interpolation at best, and so the results will almost certainly be lacklustre. However, this can be a good choice to resize a lot of footage where quality is not an issue, and the more technically-minded can put Applescript to work to batch resize lots of clips without needing Compressor.</p>
<p>To scale footage in QuickTime Pro:</p>
<ol>
<li>Open the clip (or an image sequence).</li>
<li>Select Window/Show Movie Properties.</li>
<li>Select Video Track and click the Visual Settings tab.</li>
<li>Type a new height or width (in pixels or percentage) under Scaled Size.</li>
<li>Save or export the resized clip.</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/qt-resize.png"><img border="0" width="400" src="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/qt-resize-thumb.png" alt="qt-resize" height="237" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Tip: QuickTime Pro can also be used to scale image files or sequences</p></blockquote>
<p>In the next part of the series, we&#8217;ll be looking at different cropping methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-quicktime-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resizing Shots in Final Cut Studio: Basic Scaling with FCP</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-fcp/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-fcp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final cut pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final cut studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scaling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-fcp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To resize footage quickly and easily, you can’t beat using the options built into Final Cut Pro’s interface. The results can be quite pleasing, and this method works particularly well for making images smaller, such as when adding 1080p HD footage into a 720p HD timeline. FCP makes it very easy to resize footage directly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To resize footage quickly and easily, you can’t beat using the options built into Final Cut Pro’s interface. The results can be quite pleasing, and this method works particularly well for making images smaller, such as when adding 1080p HD footage into a 720p HD timeline.</p>
<p>FCP makes it very easy to resize footage directly from within the interface. In fact, this ease can be a bit of a double-edged sword; in many occasions it can be difficult to tell precisely which shots are being scaled and which are not.</p>
<p>The problem with this method is that you don’t have much control over it. There are three different methods available (Linear, Normal and Best), and images will almost certainly fall to pieces with a lot of scaling.</p>
<p>To scale footage in Final Cut Pro:</p>
<ol>
<li>Double-click the shot in the timeline or bin.</li>
<li>Tear off the Motion tab so you can see it alongside the image. You should also stretch the canvas out as big as possible so you can see the effects of the changes.</li>
<li>Select Sequence / Settings&#8230;</li>
<li>Under the Video Processing tab, set the Motion Filtering Quality to the desired level (Best is usually the one you’ll want unless you’re in a hurry, and Linear will perform only very basic interpolation, good for fast previews).</li>
<li>Adjust the Scale parameter percentage to suit.</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/fcp-resize.png"><img border="0" width="400" src="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/fcp-resize-thumb.png" alt="fcp_resize" height="293" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Tip: Shake can be used to resize individual QuickTime movies too, and includes a much bigger selection of filters, such as Mitchell and Lanczos, each of which is better for different types of footage.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-basic-scaling-with-fcp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resizing Shots in Final Cut Studio: Introduction</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final cut studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scaling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-introduction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many situations in post-production which require the picture size of a shot to be unchanged. Unfortunately, the process of resizing digital images is far from perfect. Intuitively it should be a very simple process, like using a zoom lens on a camera to get closer to the action, or even like using an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img border="0" width="400" src="http://www.surrealroad.com/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/resize-intro.jpg" height="146" style="border: 0px" /></p>
<p>There are many situations in post-production which require the picture size of a shot to be unchanged. Unfortunately, the process of resizing digital images is far from perfect. Intuitively it should be a very simple process, like using a zoom lens on a camera to get closer to the action, or even like using an enlarger in a photographic darkroom to make the picture fit a bigger page.</p>
<p>Both of these examples use an optical process that magnifies details that were previously too small to see clearly. With digital images however, you’re limited to what’s already there. And because what’s already there is just pixels, tiny coloured square boxes, when you enlarge a digital image too far you get&#8230; big coloured square boxes.</p>
<p>Most of the time this effect goes unnoticed in the digital world. Excluding vector images (which we’ll get to later in this series), the main reason you don’t see scaled-up pixels in digital images very often is because almost every image processing application automatically performs some sort of complicated mathematics, called interpolation, on the raw data to produce the resized result.</p>
<p>Being aware of this interpolation is important for several reasons. First of all, it’s a cheat. Not in the sense that it has five aces up its sleeve, but in the sense that it’s making a sort of guess as to what the hidden details might look like. Very occasionally it will guess wrong, making the picture look worse. Most of the time it will produce fairly convincing results that are passable.</p>
<p>This series isn&#8217;t about how to get passable results though. It’s about how to get the best possible results out of Final Cut Studio, because there’s one more interesting feature of image interpolation: there are many different ways of doing it, each of which is useful for different situations and types of source footage. Although it’s incredibly convenient to just reach for the scaling control in Final Cut Pro, using other methods can produce much sharper, more vivid results.</p>
<blockquote><p>Tip: In general, it’s best to avoid resizing footage whenever possible. At best it’s a time-consuming process, and at worst it can really take the shine off of those beautiful images. However, when working with media from different sources, some form of resizing is going to be inevitable.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2008/resizing-shots-in-final-cut-studio-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EDL Sort Methods</title>
		<link>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2007/edl-sort-methods/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2007/edl-sort-methods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conforming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrealroad.com/research/archives/2007/edl-sort-methods/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given this is something that seems to come up fairly often in post, I found it remarkable that there isn&#8217;t really a concise definition of EDL sorting methods (or modes if you prefer). So for posterity, here goes: A-mode: Sorts by record timecode B-mode: Sorts by reel number then record timecode  C-mode: Sorts by reel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given this is something that seems to come up fairly often in post, I found it remarkable that there isn&#8217;t really a concise definition of EDL sorting methods (or modes if you prefer). So for posterity, here goes:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>A-mode: Sorts by record timecode</strong></li>
<li><strong>B-mode: Sorts by reel number then record timecode</strong> </li>
<li><strong>C-mode: Sorts by reel number then source timecode</strong></li>
<li><strong>D-mode: Sorts by transition (cuts first), then reel number, then record timecode</strong> </li>
<li><strong>E-mode: Sorts by transition (cuts first), then reel number, then source timecode</strong></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.surrealroad.com/archives/2007/edl-sort-methods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 705/798 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.surrealroad.com @ 2012-02-05 03:09:47 -->
